home

*********

DEAR ERIC,
MY NAME IS MIRCEA-MUGUREL SERBAN AND MY SITE IS
WWW.FREEWEBS.COM/GOLDENNO
IN WICH I'M INVITING YOU TO VISIT ESPECIALLY THE PAGE
<<NEW 2001-2004>> AND THERE, FIRSTLY THE <<LAST INSPIRATION>>, AS MATHEMATICAL PROOF FOR:

PI=4/RADICALPHI=3.144605511029694...

...MENTIONED AT THE FOURTH POSITION IN YOUR SITE (DATED OCTOBER 2002).
IT'S NOT ONLY AN APPROXIMATION, IT'S A CERTITUDE...WITH THE ALL CONSEQUENCES...BECAUSE:

POINT 1: THE ESSENTIAL KEY IS THE EQUALITY:

COS 38.17270763°=TG 38.17270763°=SIN 51.82729237°=CTG 51.82729237°=1/RADICALPHI

...AND SO ON...

SIMILARLY WITH THE FUNCTIONS OF THE ANGLES OF 0°, 45°AND 90°...BUT ALTERNATING IN AN OTHER MANNER AS EQUALITY;

BY CONSEQUENCE:

ARC 45°=1/RADICALPHI=0.786151378...

POINT 2: BY MANY MESUREMENTS IN THE FIELD (ON THE GROUND...IN MY GARDEN), I'VE ESTABLISHED, IN A SIMPLE BUT SURE (PRECISE) MANNER, THAT:

<< ANY CIRCLE IS A MULTIPLE OF 4/RADICALPHI >> !!!

TRY YOU, PLEASE, TO MEASURE !

SOME CONSEQUENCES:

1) THE RATIO BETWEEN THE CIRCUMSCRIBED SQUARE AND THE CIRCLE IS RADICALPHI, AS LENGTH AND AREA, BOTH (OF COURSE);

2) 1 RADIAN = 45 RADICALPHI°=57.24088421°...AND NOT 57.29577952°;

3) PI IS THE POSITIVE SOLUTION OF THE FOLLOWING EQUATION ESTABLISHED BY PROF. L. NITA (BUCHAREST / ROMANIA), WHO DID COLLABORATE WITH ME, OCCASIONALLY:

(X·X·X·X) + 16 (X·X) - 256 = 0

4) BY CONSEQUENCE, PI IS NOT AN IRRATIONAL TRANSCEDENTAL NUMBER, HOW DID SAY LINDEMANN IN 1882 ! IT'S AN IRRATIONAL ALGEBRIC NUMBER, BUT OF A GREAT...TRANSCENDENTALITY !!!

MY ADAGE: <<IT SEEMS COMPLEXE AND BIZARRE, BUT IT'S SIMPLE AND REAL !!!>>

I'LL CONTINUE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE...

LOVE AND PEACE,
MIRCEA-MUGUREL SERBAN